|
San
Diego Center for Oral and Facial Surgery
Problems Associated with Third
Molars
"the potential for the
development of significant, even life-threatening, disease associated with
impacted teeth is real and should be a factor in the decision-making process
when oral surgeons and others are confronted with the dilemma of managing an
impacted tooth."
Journal of Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgery 60(6):613-617,2002
Infection (periodontitis /
pericornitis):
|

|
The appearance of infection is the most
common reason for the immediate removal of wisdom teeth. Due to
crowding that often occurs in the area of third molar eruption, food,
debris, and bacteria collect in areas that are impossible to clean. This
can lead to serious and life-threatening infection. |
Damage to lower second molar:
|

|
Severe decay
induced by the eruption of the mesially angled third molar into the distal
aspect of the adjacent second molar. The third molar was removed and the
second molar required a root canal and crown. In cases where the second
molar is beyond repair, removal of the second molar and replacement with a
dental implant becomes necessary. |
Damage to upper second molar:
 |
 |
| Tooth #2 (second
maxillary molar pictured on the right) was rendered irreparable by the
impacted wisdom tooth #1 in this 35 year old male. The patient had no
symptoms until severe damage had already occurred on tooth #2. The
patient will now require extensive bone grafting and a dental implant to
replace the lost second molar. Hence the philosophy that you do not have
to remove your wisdom teeth until problems occur was shown to be completely
wrong in this patient's case. |
Pathology (dentigerous cyst):
 |
45 year-old with a
dentigerous cyst resulting from an impacted lower third molar. This type
of cyst tends to grow very slowly causing little to no symptoms until
damage, such as severe bone loss, has occurred. The third molar was removed
along with the cyst. The diagnosis of dentigerous cyst was confirmed by
the pathologist. Bone grafting needed to be performed in a second surgery
and a root canal had to be performed on the second molar due to
the devitilization of the second molar by the pathologic process. |
Pathologic fracture:
 |
65 year-old with a
chronic infection related to an impacted lower third molar. The patient
refused to have her tooth removed. The delay in proper treatment resulted
in progression of the deep bone infection caused by the impacted third
molar. This eventually resulted in a pathologic fracture of the jaw. |
Supraeruption:
 |
A tooth may
supraerupt beyond the level of the neighboring teeth if there is no
supporting tooth opposing it. In this case the upper wisdom tooth
supraerupted and eroded into the soft tissues of the pharynx causing a
secondary infection. |
Head and neck abscess:
 |
Infections caused
by impacted third molars can spread into the surrounding tissues of the
head and neck. In this case, the infection spread into the soft tissue
spaces of the neck resulting in near collapse of the airway and a life
threatening emergency. Months previous to this, the patient was advised to
have her third molars removed; however, the patient failed to comply with
the recommended treatment. The patient was taken to the hospital where
emergency medical and surgical treatment were initiated. The patient
survived and recovered well afterwards. |
Ulceration and infection caused by an erupted
upper third molar:
 |
 |
Due to lack of space, erupting
upper third molars can cause ulceration in the neighboring soft tissue. In
this case tooth #1 (blue line) caused a large painful ulceration (yellow
line) that led to a secondary infection. The tooth was removed and the
patient recovered well. |
Abnormal eruption of adjacent teeth:
|

|
An impacted third molar may
affect the normal eruption of an adjacent tooth. In this case the
permanent second molar's eruption was adversely affected by the impacted
third molar behind it, requiring the removal of both the third molar and
the second molar. The only option for practical replacement of the second
molar in this case is a dental implant. |
Bone loss distal to adjacent tooth:
|

|
A malerupting third molar can
cause severe distal bone loss to the adjacent tooth. In this case bone
grafting was necessary to salvage the second molar. This added expense to
the procedure and the potential for future periodontal problems involving
the second molar. |
|